|
Dipmeters
in the Oil Industry Oil and gas wells have been
logged with dipmeters since 1965. Early readings were taken
from 3 resistivity pads and dip was calculated by hand.
The tools were quickly developed to run continuously and
more pads were added. Today many tools have almost complete
borehole coverage, the technology having converged with
borehole imaging tools. Many of the tools measure resitivity
at various depths of investigation. Sonic based imaging
tools can also be used to measure dips and are particularly
good for fracture detection and are not affected by oil-based
muds. Recently, it has been possible to run tools in the
LWD (logging while drilling) string and transmit images
back to surface in real time. Quite remarkable technology. The early manual interpretation
by the dedicated geologist moved into a phase of automated
interpretation. While this may be useful for structural
dip at the wellsite, much information was lost during the
oversimplified automation process. In fact artefacts could
be introduced by incorrect processing parameters. Imagine
going out into the field, looking at some structures in
a cliff and attempting to automate the thinking process.
Things have come full circle, for many years dips have
been picked by a geologist using special software. The
dips are often classified into structural, faults and sedimentological,
depending on the resolution and quality of the data, can
be further classified into more types. Linear or Curved Features across the borehole The most common method
is to assume that the beds or features are planar and
this is used as a first pass when fitting a sinusoid
to the log data. It is in general suitable for shaley
sequences of low energy. However, it is also possible
to identify curved features such as high energy cross-bedding.
Nodules often have curved sides. To define a curved feature,
at least a 6-arm dipmeter tool is needed in practice.
This gives enough data points to define a curved surface. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
| |
|||||