Working Practices in Reservoir Study TeamsGood liaison and teamwork amongst the various disciplines
is key to a successful study.
Data Go back to the original data sources where possible. Eliminate errors in manipulation of the data and sense the reliability of the data.
Some data may be rejected as unreliable. Remember that what a team member thinks is “data” and
what is “interpretation” varies according to their viewpoint, discipline and the quality of data acquisition. For instance a geophysicist will make a seismic interpretation and depth conversion of the reservoir horizon. This will be provided to the reservoir modeller as “input data”. Another example: layer formation pressures are used in different ways by different disciplines. The Use of Multiple Models Multiple models of the reservoir can be built in order to
give a range of outcomes to the project. These deterministic models are
built according to a particular geological idea about the sub-surface. Geological Methodology for input into
Dynamic Reservoir Modelling Initially, minimise the number of steps to create the static model. It is possible that a simple model is adequate, such as in some gas reservoirs. The key parameters can be studied further so that the model can be refined to honour the dynamic data. Complex models using all possible workflow steps and data subdivisions (e.g. facies) do not guarantee a valid dynamic model. When refining the model, it is usually more valid to try global changes before local changes. Keep track of model versions. The first model provided to the reservoir engineer should be a good attempt, but it will not be the final version. Avoid using the term “base case” until sensitivities have been examined. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||